2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of copy number variants by three detection algorithms and their association with body size in horses

Abstract: BackgroundCopy number variants (CNVs) have been shown to play an important role in genetic diversity of mammals and in the development of many complex phenotypic traits. The aim of this study was to perform a standard comparative evaluation of CNVs in horses using three different CNV detection programs and to identify genomic regions associated with body size in horses.ResultsAnalysis was performed using the Illumina Equine SNP50 genotyping beadchip for 854 horses. CNVs were detected by three different algorit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
63
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
18
63
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 700 CNVs on autosomals were detected (Table 1 and Table S2 in File S1), including 302 gains and 398 losses. And the average number of CNVs per individual was 120, ranging from 82 to 211, slightly less than Doan of 139.3 (2368/17, CGH analysis) [30], while significantly greater than Dupuis of 5.9 (2797/477, SNP analysis) [31] and Metzger of 5.6 (4013/717, SNP analysis) [32]. This might be caused by different experimental samples or detection methods of CNV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In total, 700 CNVs on autosomals were detected (Table 1 and Table S2 in File S1), including 302 gains and 398 losses. And the average number of CNVs per individual was 120, ranging from 82 to 211, slightly less than Doan of 139.3 (2368/17, CGH analysis) [30], while significantly greater than Dupuis of 5.9 (2797/477, SNP analysis) [31] and Metzger of 5.6 (4013/717, SNP analysis) [32]. This might be caused by different experimental samples or detection methods of CNV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, newborn homozygous QQ and heterozygous Qq dairy calves were found to be 18.8 and 10.4% heavier, respectively, compared to homozygous qq calves (Littlejohn et al 2012). Variants of PLAG1 have also been suggested to contribute to body size in European domestic pigs and horses (Rubin et al 2012, Metzger et al 2013, indicating that this role of PLAG1 is likely to be conserved across mammals. It should be emphasized, however, that although PLAG1 was found to be the most plausible candidate on chromosome 14 as the causative gene for stature differences in cattle, other genes in the vicinity of PLAG1, such as RPS20, MOS, RDHE2, SDR16C6, and PENK, some of which having established links with growth, were also differentially expressed in the fetal tissues of QQ and qq animals (Karim et al 2011).…”
Section: Evidence From Genome-wide Association Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The algorithm (cnvPartition) is optimized for Illumina's data and was shown to be able to detect regions which to a large extent overlap with regions detected by other methods. Additionally, lower number of CNVs can be detected by this algorithm when compared to other available methods, which suggests than cnvPartition may be more prone to detection of false-negatives rather than false-positives (Metzger et al 2013). This is satisfying if the reasonable number of high-quality regions is the point of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Most of them use signal intensity and allelic intensity ratios as well as allele calls (allele frequency spectra analysis) to detect genomic regions showing a loss or gain of copy number. Recently, efforts have been made to compare these methods and indicate the best performing approach (Winchester et al 2009;Koike et al 2011;Metzger et al 2013). However, each method has its strengths and weaknesses, making it difficult to point the best one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%