2012
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2011.649075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of core physics experiments on irradiated BWR MOX fuel in the REBUS program

Abstract: Critical experiments were performed in the REBUS program on a core loaded with a test bundle including 16 irradiated BWR-type MOX rods of average burnup of 61 GWd/t. The experimental data were analyzed using diffusion, transport, and continuous-energy Monte Carlo calculation codes coupled with nuclear data libraries based on JENDL-3.2 or JENDL-3.3. Biases in effective multiplication factors of the critical cores were 71.0%Dk for the diffusion calculations (JENDL-3.2), 70.3%Dk for the transport calculations (JE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neutronics analysis of the data have been reported by the organizations participating in the programs. 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Alander et al 6) and Yamamoto et al, 7) who analyzed the measured isotopic compositions of the high-burnup BWR MOX fuel in the REBUS program, observed that the burnup calculations based on an infinite assembly model overestimated fissile isotopes of U and Pu. They attributed it to harder neutron energy spectra in the assembly calculations than those under actual irradiation conditions, where the MOX assembly was burnt surrounded by UO 2 assemblies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutronics analysis of the data have been reported by the organizations participating in the programs. 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Alander et al 6) and Yamamoto et al, 7) who analyzed the measured isotopic compositions of the high-burnup BWR MOX fuel in the REBUS program, observed that the burnup calculations based on an infinite assembly model overestimated fissile isotopes of U and Pu. They attributed it to harder neutron energy spectra in the assembly calculations than those under actual irradiation conditions, where the MOX assembly was burnt surrounded by UO 2 assemblies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the measurement data of the institutes A, B, and A were referred for the MOX, UO 2 -M, and UO 2 -L samples, respectively. This is because (1) the present authors have many experiences to analyze the isotopic composition data of the institute A [3,[9][10][11] for samples taken from MOX and UO 2 fuel assemblies and confirmed the characteristics of the measured data, (2) the institute B adopted a similar measurement technique to the institute A such as mass spectrometry, and (3) the data of the institute C often showed different trends from those of the other institutes.…”
Section: Isotopic Composition Measurements On Pwr Fuel In Malibu Programmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The axial configuration of the core structures and the fuel rods are shown in Refs. [4] and [10]. [9].…”
Section: Core Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to extend database for the above validation study (ii), the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES) has implemented a core physics experimental program FUBILA [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. 1 It aimed at obtaining the core physics characteristics of full MOX BWR cores, which consisted of high Pu-content BWR MOX assemblies for achieving high burnup of fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%