2011
DOI: 10.4141/cjps2010-032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of covariance in agronomy and crop research

Abstract: P. 2011. Analysis of covariance in agronomy and crop research. Can. J. Plant Sci. 91: 621Á641.Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a statistical technique that combines the methods of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression analysis. However, ANCOVA is an advanced topic that often appears towards the end of many textbooks, and thus, it is either taught cursorily or ignored completely in many statistics classes. Additionally, many elaborated applications of ANCOVA to agronomy and crop research along with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of planting date on yield was further evaluated with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) following the method developed by Yang and Juskiw (2011). The implementation of ANCOVA reduced the error mean square, accounted for missing data, and served to increase the precision of the resulting regression analysis.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of planting date on yield was further evaluated with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) following the method developed by Yang and Juskiw (2011). The implementation of ANCOVA reduced the error mean square, accounted for missing data, and served to increase the precision of the resulting regression analysis.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planting date was considered a covariate and classification variable by generating a second column of data (s) identical to the planting date to be used as the covariate. Type 1 sums of squares was specified via the METHOD statement in PROC MIXED (Yang and Juskiw, 2011). Direct regression variables (covariates) s and s*s represent linear and quadratic responses to planting date and are part of the MODEL statement.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result corroborates Yang et al (2004) which asserts that the RCBD has a low efficiency in experiments containing a large number of treatments, showing that the analysis of variance autoregressive is able to around this problem by reducing the variability of the block factor. Yang and Juskiw (2011) say that in RCBD, proper blocking can reduce error by maximizing the difference between blocks and maintaining the plot-to-plot homogeneity within blocks, but blocking is ineffective if heterogeneity between plots does not follow a definite pattern (e.g., spotty soil heterogeneity; unpredictable pest incidence after blocking). In addition, when block size is large (>8-12 plots per block), intra-block heterogeneity is inevitable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before analysis, the data was subjected to a normality test (of the total length distribution data) using the Shapiro-Wilk's W-test (Shapiro et al, 1968). Thereafter, Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was employed to determine the effect of hook size, season and sampling sites on the size of fish caught during the study period, using the method described by Yang and Juskiw, (2011). All tests were considered significant at the 95% confidence level (α = 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%