1997
DOI: 10.1109/77.659440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of critical-state problems in type-II superconductivity

Abstract: An efficient numerical scheme is proposed for modeling the hysteretic magnetization of type-II superconductors. Numerical examples are presented for the Bean and Kim critical state models. It is shown that Bean's model is a Hele-Shaw type problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
124
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
124
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach of Prigozhin mathematically treats the electric field as a subdifferential of a critical energy density which takes either the value 0 if the current density does not exceed some critical value or infinity otherwise. By analyzing the subdifferential formulation, the magnetic penetration and the current distribution around the superconductor in 2D situation were intensively investigated by Prigozhin (1996bPrigozhin ( ,1997Prigozhin ( ,1998Prigozhin ( ,2004. Adopting the variational formulation by Prigozhin, Elliott et al (2004) reported a numerical analysis of the Bean critical state model modelling the magnetic field and the current density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of Prigozhin mathematically treats the electric field as a subdifferential of a critical energy density which takes either the value 0 if the current density does not exceed some critical value or infinity otherwise. By analyzing the subdifferential formulation, the magnetic penetration and the current distribution around the superconductor in 2D situation were intensively investigated by Prigozhin (1996bPrigozhin ( ,1997Prigozhin ( ,1998Prigozhin ( ,2004. Adopting the variational formulation by Prigozhin, Elliott et al (2004) reported a numerical analysis of the Bean critical state model modelling the magnetic field and the current density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nonlinear constitutive relation is given in the Bean model by a m ultivalued monotone graph: (Here we h a ve adopted units in which the critical current density j c = 1.) The magnetization model with this current-voltage law is equivalent t o a n e v olutionary variational inequality, see 15], and such a f o r m ulation is convenient for both the numerical approximation and theoretical study of these magnetization problems 15,16,17,18]. In simple cases the solution to the Bean model can be found analytically see, e.g., the two examples in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, with the constraints that the net current must be zero and the current density does not exceed the J c . Introducing the J c ͑H i ͒ dependence by means of a first-order iterative algorithm, it is found that, following the notation of Prigozhin, 16 minimizing this functional with the current density J is equivalent to minimizing a functional FЈ with the current density variation ␦J defined as the difference, at present field H, between the present current density J͑r , H͒ and the previous current density Ĵ͑r , H͒ ͑at the first step of H a , Ĵ͑r , H͒ is assumed zero͒. The functional FЈ is defined as…”
Section: Tunability Of the Critical-current Density In Superconductormentioning
confidence: 99%