1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Cross-Polarization Dynamics between Two Abundant Nuclei, 19F and 1H, Based on Spin Thermodynamics Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A 0 ), the significant drop of the signal intensity of about 60% was observed in the region belonging to the response from carbons 5, 10 and 20 ($100 ppm), the only ones that have directly attached protons, while the signals originating from the quaternary carbons are not influenced by 1 H spin lock. This observation is consistent with direct LGCP experiments under MAS, where the carbon signal intensity shows an oscillatory behavior as a function of contact time, with maximum signal intensity usually obtained under 100 ls contact time for CH moiety, depending on the strength of the heteronuclear dipolar coupling [60]. Since CP is a coherent process, similar behavior happens for 13 C ?…”
Section: C ? 1 H Hyperpolarization Transfer and Carbon Acquisitionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3A 0 ), the significant drop of the signal intensity of about 60% was observed in the region belonging to the response from carbons 5, 10 and 20 ($100 ppm), the only ones that have directly attached protons, while the signals originating from the quaternary carbons are not influenced by 1 H spin lock. This observation is consistent with direct LGCP experiments under MAS, where the carbon signal intensity shows an oscillatory behavior as a function of contact time, with maximum signal intensity usually obtained under 100 ls contact time for CH moiety, depending on the strength of the heteronuclear dipolar coupling [60]. Since CP is a coherent process, similar behavior happens for 13 C ?…”
Section: C ? 1 H Hyperpolarization Transfer and Carbon Acquisitionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The possible 13 C ? 1 H transfer of hyperpolarization can be studied either by detecting the residual 13 C polarization after CP transfer similar to CP-drain experiments [60] or by detecting the buildup of 1 H polarization directly. In the first set of experiments, we used sequences 1 and 2 and expected to observe the decay of 13 C hyperpolarization presumably due to 13 C ?…”
Section: C ? 1 H Hyperpolarization Transfer and Carbon Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, eq can be simplified as where T 2 is the time constant of Gauss decay (eq ). This equation is perhaps the most often used for the processing of experimental CP kinetic data in the cases where it was deduced that the nonclassical I–I*–S model , was to be more appropriate, compared to the classical one (I–S model), , see, for example, refs , , , and . The time constant T 2 characterizes the dipolar 31 P– 1 H coupling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two spin coupling models are met in the literature that are most often applied for the processing of CP kinetic data: the “classical” model, denoted as I–S (in the present work the spins I and S are 1 H and 13 C, respectively) and the “nonclassical” one, I–I*–S, where the asterisk denotes spins I being in close neighborhood to S spins . In the first case (I–S model) it is assumed that spin-diffusion is fast enough to establish communication between the protons and to force them to behave as a system with a uniform spin temperature. , If S nuclei are highly diluted among I nuclei, i.e., N S ≪ N I , and the CP process is fast enough compared with the spin–lattice relaxation of spin S in the rotating frame the dependence of the CP signal intensity I ( t ) on the contact time t can be described by where 1/ T IS is the CP rate constant and 1/ T 1ρ is the spin–lattice relaxation rate of spin I in the rotating frame.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In the first case (I−S model) it is assumed that spin-diffusion is fast enough to establish communication between the protons and to force them to behave as a system with a uniform spin temperature. 6,34 If S nuclei are highly diluted among I nuclei, i.e., N S ≪ N I , and the CP process is fast enough compared with the spin−lattice relaxation of spin S in the rotating frame the dependence of the CP signal intensity I(t) on the contact time t can be described by…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%