Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support 2016
DOI: 10.5220/0006044601820187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Curling Team Strategy and Tactics using Curling Informatics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we (Otani et al, 2016) analyzed game information of the Sochi Winter Olympics in 2014 and confirmed that correlation of the world national top level was lower than the Japanese top level and that the selected strategies/tactics and psychological pressure on the opponent team had an impact on game result .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we (Otani et al, 2016) analyzed game information of the Sochi Winter Olympics in 2014 and confirmed that correlation of the world national top level was lower than the Japanese top level and that the selected strategies/tactics and psychological pressure on the opponent team had an impact on game result .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Otani et al analyzed correlation of 93 games in Sochi Winter Olympics 2014 to verify the above assumption (Otani et al, 2016). As a result, they confirmed that there is a strong correlation between the difference in shot accuracies and the difference in game scores.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…When the literature is reviewed, it is seen that research on curling are related to sports psychology (Westlund Stewart and Hall, 2017;Tamminen and Crocker, 2013;Collins and Durand-Bush, 2010, 2014Paquette and Sullivan, 2012;Shank and Yves, 2013;Stewart and Hall, 2016), engineering (Buckingham et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2019;Gwon et al, 2020;Heo and Kim, 2013;Ito and Kitasei, 2015;Kawamura et al, 2015;Masui et al, 2016), sweeping (Bradley, 2009;Kim et al, 2021;Yanagi et al, 2008;, hammer (Kostuk and Willoughby, 2006;Ahmad et al, 2016;David, 2012) and strategy (Willoughby and Kostuk, 2005;Otani et al, 2016;Willoughby and Kostuk, 2004). However, no study has been found on the revised FGZ rule in order to increase the excitement in curling and attract more people's attention.…”
Section: Figure 1 Free Guard Zone Shown In Shaded Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the strategy determined before the end, or the current position of the rocks, the teams can throw their stones into the house, remove the opponent's rocks from the game, move them away from the house or place their own rocks as guards for the next moves (Neyedly, 2012). At the conclusion of the end (when 16 stone have been delivered) the object is to count as many stones as possible closer to the center of the house than the opponent's stone nearest to the center of the house (Otani et al, 2016). The hammer shot is an extremely important factor as scoring is made after the hammer which is the final shot of the end (Ahmad et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is to provide strategic advice by experts after statistics, and the other is to use computer algorithms. The curling data collection and analysis system proposed by Wang Xuefeng et al [1], the curling simulation system named "Digital Curling" designed by Ito et al [10] in 2015, and the portable digital scorebook (ICE) designed by Fumito Masui et al [11] can record game information for subsequent curling strategy development [12,13]. However, there are not so many professional coaches to help athletes make decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%