2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of cutting parameters and cooling/lubrication methods for sustainable machining in turning of Haynes 25 superalloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason of this result may be explained as the use of different cutter tool geometries due to experimental design of the study [39]. Sarikaya and Gullu [33] reported that there was a decreasing trend in surface roughness -when increasing cutting speed in turning of Haynes 25 superalloy. SEM images of the study showed that the increase of cutting speed from 15 m/min to 30 m/min resulted in significantly less adhesion in the nose section of the cutting tool.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The reason of this result may be explained as the use of different cutter tool geometries due to experimental design of the study [39]. Sarikaya and Gullu [33] reported that there was a decreasing trend in surface roughness -when increasing cutting speed in turning of Haynes 25 superalloy. SEM images of the study showed that the increase of cutting speed from 15 m/min to 30 m/min resulted in significantly less adhesion in the nose section of the cutting tool.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The cutting speeds varied between 150 and 300 m/min. It was reported that flank wear, crater and notching formation and plastic deformation were observed as wear behaviors [33] and the optimum cutting speed was 250 m/min for both tool materials.…”
Section: Tool Wearmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations