2020
DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2020.1727592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of dense phase pneumatic conveying of fly ash using CFD including particle size distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the solids pressure drop prediction for dense phase conveying is challenging, as the flow of fine particles is turbulent and pulsatile. Researchers prefer to model the solid friction factor for predicting the pressure drop due to solids (which are called empirical power function-based models) through long pipelines, as it is simple and involves less time as compared to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Alkassar et al, 2020;Manjula et al, 2017) and discrete element method (DEM) (Ariyaratne et al, 2019;Kuang et al, 2019). In this empirical power function-based models, the solid friction factor is expressed in terms of a number of non-dimensional parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the solids pressure drop prediction for dense phase conveying is challenging, as the flow of fine particles is turbulent and pulsatile. Researchers prefer to model the solid friction factor for predicting the pressure drop due to solids (which are called empirical power function-based models) through long pipelines, as it is simple and involves less time as compared to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Alkassar et al, 2020;Manjula et al, 2017) and discrete element method (DEM) (Ariyaratne et al, 2019;Kuang et al, 2019). In this empirical power function-based models, the solid friction factor is expressed in terms of a number of non-dimensional parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%