2021
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Determinants of Postoperative Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty

Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis: To analyze different variables that influence postrhinoplasty quality of life outcomes to ascertain the determinants of postoperative satisfaction.Study Design: Prospective, observational study.Methods: This was a prospective, observational study where patients were divided into two groups based on the postoperative Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) score: high satisfaction group, when postoperative ROE scores were >50, and low satisfaction group, when postoperative ROE scores were ≤5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No study was reported from the South‐East Asian and African regions. Country‐wise distribution, Brazil had the highest number of studies with five, 17,18,25,30,31 followed by four from Iran, 19,23,24,32 two from Belgium, 2,10 and two from the United Kingdom 21,28 . Egypt, 26 Saudi Arabia, 29 Singapore, 20 Turkey, 27 and the United States 22 were the origin of one study, each.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…No study was reported from the South‐East Asian and African regions. Country‐wise distribution, Brazil had the highest number of studies with five, 17,18,25,30,31 followed by four from Iran, 19,23,24,32 two from Belgium, 2,10 and two from the United Kingdom 21,28 . Egypt, 26 Saudi Arabia, 29 Singapore, 20 Turkey, 27 and the United States 22 were the origin of one study, each.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 1. A total of 18 studies were enrolled in this systematic review and meta‐analysis, with an overall sample size of 2132 2,10,17–32 . All the studies were published papers with a cross‐sectional design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations