Analysis of Dialogue Speech between Users tied by Co-occurrence and Mutual Assistance Matching

Gomi, Reona; Aizawa, Hidekazu; Sato-Shimokwara, Eri; Yamaguchi, Toru

doi:10.1299/jsmermd.2017.2a1-l09

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the results, we selected user pairs to use this system. Moreover, in our previous research, we conducted a conversation experiment for users connected by mutual assistance matching with a help of mediators [10]. Topics suggested by a mediator in their conversation topics are likely to support smoother communication.…”

Section: Matching Between Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Speech Dialogue to Detect Active Conversation and Lapse in Conversation toward Development of Conversation Support Robot after Co-occurrence and Mutual Assistance Matching

Gomi

Aizawa

Sato-Shimokawara

et al. 2019

Journal of Signal Processing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The formation of human relationships is important to form communities. As a supporting system to strengthen the bonding among community members, we firstly tried to connect users by co-occurrence and mutual assistance matching to form relationships. Then, we brought them together. At the time of this experiment, users can easily carry on animated conversations if a common topic is suggested to them. In this study, we utilized a questionnaire to acquire user's personal characteristics for co-occurrence and mutual assistance matching. Next, we conducted a conversation experiment via Skype to investigate activation and inactivation during user's conversations by using speech dialogue and the LF/HF ratio calculated from user's heart rates. During the conversation experiment, matched users made conversations for 10 min on each common topic based on their interests suggested. The result showed that users could easily have animated conversations when a common topic was suggested to them. In addition, we investigated acoustic features, the overlap of utterances, and the number of utterances, backchannel feedbacks, and laughter.

show abstract

Section: Matching Between Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%