2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-6359(00)00071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of digitizing errors of a laser scanning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It also suffers from problems of digitization of any non-surface features such as slots or holes, due to occlusions and obscuration of these artefacts. In general, laser line scanning is considered to be less accurate in comparison with tactile probing [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also suffers from problems of digitization of any non-surface features such as slots or holes, due to occlusions and obscuration of these artefacts. In general, laser line scanning is considered to be less accurate in comparison with tactile probing [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undesired effects of the scan depth and, more importantly, of the projected angle are not considered in the standard calibration procedure. The resulting digitalizing error in the laser-scanned data represents a combination of random error and systematic error [28]. Simulation of the part surface reflection is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Non-ideal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough analysis of digitizing errors has been presented [11] and methods for error correction based on experimental process have also been discussed [12]. A methodology for comparison of laser digitizing relative to contact measurements was performed for validating the accuracy when measuring dimensional and geometrical tolerances [13].…”
Section: -P2mentioning
confidence: 99%