2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2012.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of directional patterns of lung nodules in computerized tomography using Getis statistics and their accumulated forms as malignancy and benignity indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the sensitivity and specificity values were close to 65%, however, KUR and SKW should not be used alone; rather, they should be combined with other parameters. Therefore, volumetric assessment and volume doubling time remain key elements in the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules [34, 35]. More recently, Mao et al [23] evaluated the usefulness of a radiomic predictive model developed from baseline low-dose CT screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the sensitivity and specificity values were close to 65%, however, KUR and SKW should not be used alone; rather, they should be combined with other parameters. Therefore, volumetric assessment and volume doubling time remain key elements in the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules [34, 35]. More recently, Mao et al [23] evaluated the usefulness of a radiomic predictive model developed from baseline low-dose CT screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classification method based on traditional machine learning, in order to better distinguish between benign nodules and malignant nodules, solutions based on support vector machines, random forests, clustering, and self-encoders have been widely used [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. For example, Ashis et al first used semi-automatic techniques to segment the nodules, then extracted the shape and texture features of the nodules, and then selected the features, and finally sent the relevant features to the support vector machine for classification [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%