2002
DOI: 10.1080/10382040208667476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Discourse in Collaborative Cartographic Problem Solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This connects to several recent research programs on map design. Discourse analysis of map-making strategies by students (Wiegand 2002) illustrates one method to investigate how students are thinking about making maps. Research on multi-objective decision-making in map design (Xiao and Armstrong 2012) similarly aims to "help novice map makers understand the design process and make cartographic principles more relevant to an expanding community of non-geographers."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This connects to several recent research programs on map design. Discourse analysis of map-making strategies by students (Wiegand 2002) illustrates one method to investigate how students are thinking about making maps. Research on multi-objective decision-making in map design (Xiao and Armstrong 2012) similarly aims to "help novice map makers understand the design process and make cartographic principles more relevant to an expanding community of non-geographers."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with a few other geography educators (e.g., Leinhardt, Stainton, & Bausmith, 1998; Owen, 2003), Wiegand (2002a, 2002b) has explored the relationship between collaborative learning—specifically the quality of student talk—and computerized map making. Using analytical linguistic tracking devices, which code moves such as “Reason” moves (those that “provide explanations for mapping behavior”) and “Question” moves (those that “invite an explanatory response”), Wiegand (2006) found that higher levels of student discourse were positively associated with map-based learning.…”
Section: Children’s Mapping and Socio-political Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of this approach as a useful complement to other methods is that it can provide insight into the interactive social process of teaching and learning, in this case helping us to better understand the process through which students gain both research and mapping skills. It is also helpful in understanding how they learn critical thinking about geographies and histories over time and in concert with others, including both their peers and their teachers (Wiegand 2002, 2006; Elwood 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%