2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03820.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of donor deferral at three blood centers in Brazil

Abstract: Background The safety of the blood supply is ensured through several procedures from donor selection to testing of donated units. Examination of the donor deferrals at different centers provides insights into the role that deferrals play in transfusion safety. Methods A cross-sectional descriptive study of prospective allogeneic blood donors at three large blood centers located in São Paulo, Belo Horizonte and Recife, Brazil from August 2007 to December 2009 was conducted. Deferrals were grouped into similar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

14
52
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of donors with low Hb were females, and this is in line with other reports worldwide 3,17, 22–24. Low Hb has been reported as a major cause of deferral in many studies reported from Turkey, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Japan, India, and Pakistan; the results of our study is also in line with these reports 6,7,14,19,25. We believe that combining anemia prevention measures and treatment in donor recruitment strategies could help regain the donors and developing a healthy blood donor pool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of donors with low Hb were females, and this is in line with other reports worldwide 3,17, 22–24. Low Hb has been reported as a major cause of deferral in many studies reported from Turkey, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Japan, India, and Pakistan; the results of our study is also in line with these reports 6,7,14,19,25. We believe that combining anemia prevention measures and treatment in donor recruitment strategies could help regain the donors and developing a healthy blood donor pool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In spite of the importance of blood donor selection for blood safety, we need to consider that selection processes might have negative impacts on the blood supply, as many deferred donors might not return to donate again due to negative feelings resulting from their deferral 3,4. Hence, it is crucial to define a rational, evidence-based donor selection process and eliminate practices that lead to the unnecessary deferral of volunteered donors 5,6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First-time donors were more frequently deferred than repeat donors, especially because of interview decisions and medication; this corroborates previous studies [8,22]. Although young first-time donors have the potential to increase the donor pool, temporary deferral may discourage them from returning for subsequent donation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Recruitment, selection, and retention of voluntary non-remunerated donors from low-risk populations are the cornerstones of a safe, sustainable, and adequate national blood supply [7]. Screening, however, can lead to either temporary or permanent deferral, resulting in lower donation rates that could further limit the donor pool [8]. Early reports have shown that prospective donors who were temporarily deferred returned less frequently for subsequent donation than those who donated successfully, and this was especially true for first-time donors [9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recife showed a lower proportion of female donations, and this may be explained by the lower socioeconomic characteristics of the state and region that can affect women’s health and eligibility to donate blood. Higher rates of deferral have already been described in Recife, especially due to a low haemoglobin level [13]. In addition, Recife has not been prioritizing campaigns focusing on recruiting more female donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%