2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of dual tree M‐band wavelet transform based features for brain image classification

Abstract: Viewing the experimental results, we conclude that the system gives a satisfactory performance for the brain image classification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All approaches fall into two categories: supervised and unsupervised. The former one uses Artificial Neural Network (ANN) [1][2][3], Support Vector Machine (SVM) [4][5], Naive Bayes (NB), and k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN) [1,6] and the later one uses Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) [7] and self-organizing map [8]. While comparing the performance of these two types of approaches, supervised classification is superior to unsupervised approaches in terms of classification accuracy, as the unsupervised approaches require experts with strong knowledge to select the meaningful features and also prone to error for the classification of large scale data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All approaches fall into two categories: supervised and unsupervised. The former one uses Artificial Neural Network (ANN) [1][2][3], Support Vector Machine (SVM) [4][5], Naive Bayes (NB), and k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN) [1,6] and the later one uses Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) [7] and self-organizing map [8]. While comparing the performance of these two types of approaches, supervised classification is superior to unsupervised approaches in terms of classification accuracy, as the unsupervised approaches require experts with strong knowledge to select the meaningful features and also prone to error for the classification of large scale data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature extraction techniques utilize spatial [6] and frequency domain [1][2][3][4][5] analysis methods and it is well known that frequency domain features give rich texture information than spatial domain features for classification [9]. Among the frequency domain analysis, Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) is a powerful tool for a signal as well as image processing [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional machine learning techniques can be characterized based on the extracted features and the type of classifier. The feature extraction techniques include gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level run-length (GLRL), speededup robust feature extraction (SURF), and dual-tree m-band wavelet transform (DTMBWT) algorithms [171][172][173][174][175][176]. The classifiers include support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (K-NN), Random Forest (ensemble classifiers on three ensemble algorithms: bagging, Adaboost, and random subspace), and fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM) [177].…”
Section: Image Analysis Of Inflammatory Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important features used in many medial image analysis systems [19][20] which uses are energy and entropy features. Also, the spatial information's are described by the co-occurrence features.…”
Section: Fig 2 Frequency Domain Of Shearletsmentioning
confidence: 99%