2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of dynamic surfactant mass transfer and its relationship to the transient stabilization of coalescing liquid–liquid dispersions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the dynamic surfactant concentration. This effect will relate to partial destabilization through coalescence and its consequences for the remaining droplets 120 .…”
Section: Dynamic Surfactant Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the dynamic surfactant concentration. This effect will relate to partial destabilization through coalescence and its consequences for the remaining droplets 120 .…”
Section: Dynamic Surfactant Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grimes et al have determined the adsorption isotherm of C5Pe at the xylene/water interface 120 . It was found that the interfacial tension data are well-fitted by a Langmuir type isotherm which confirms the fact that C5Pe forms a monolayer at the w/o interface.…”
Section: Model Compounds As Stabilizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was considered in various books, such as [1][2][3][4]; also, a number of studies were published in which both adsorption (equilibrium and kinetic) and rheological characteristics at the surfactant aqueous solution/alkane (oil) interface are analysed [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30). However, to the best of our knowledge, it was not until very recently that the first experimental proofs of this phenomenon were published [91][92][93]. In regard to the present emulsions, we analyzed the possibility that the discrepancy between theory and experiment shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%