2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43610-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Economic Impact of Online Reviews: An Approach for Market-Driven Requirements Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the studies which used online reviews, a majority of the studies used app reviews as the sources of potential requirements (75%) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. Of them, 14 used app reviews from multiple distribution platforms such as Apple AppStore and Google Play to increase the level of generalizability, while eleven used those from a single distribution platform, and one did not specify the number of app distribution platforms • Of the studies which used online reviews, 17% (n = 6) extracted user reviews of software and video games [55], IoT products [56], compact cameras [57], internet security [58], Jira and Trello [59], and Jingdong. com [60].…”
Section: The Specific Types Of Dynamic Data Used For Automated Requirmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the studies which used online reviews, a majority of the studies used app reviews as the sources of potential requirements (75%) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. Of them, 14 used app reviews from multiple distribution platforms such as Apple AppStore and Google Play to increase the level of generalizability, while eleven used those from a single distribution platform, and one did not specify the number of app distribution platforms • Of the studies which used online reviews, 17% (n = 6) extracted user reviews of software and video games [55], IoT products [56], compact cameras [57], internet security [58], Jira and Trello [59], and Jingdong. com [60].…”
Section: The Specific Types Of Dynamic Data Used For Automated Requirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• K-means clustering has been used to extract software features from online reviews [41,58,63,75,78,90], and to cluster informative app reviews [53] Jiang et al [41] used S-GN to cluster online reviews, while Cleland-Huang et al in [78] used the modified Spherical K-Means to extract and cluster feature requests from threads in open discussion forums. • Kang et al [91] used the bagging clustering algorithm, which combines the EM, K-means, and MTree clustering algorithms for grouping similar data to select transfer instances.…”
Section: Traditional Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guzman et al presented an exploratory study of Twitter messages to help requirements engineers better capture user needs information for software evolution [4]. Jiang et al used text mining technology to evaluate quantitatively the economic impact of user opinions that might be a potential requirement of software [5]. Guzman and Maalej proposed an automated approach to extract the user sentiments about the identified features from user reviews.…”
Section: Requirements Evolution Prediction Through Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process did not consider the evolution of SPLs at all and did not address the requirements engineering phase. Jiang et.al [14] proposed an approach for requirements evolution from an economic perspective. The authors have examined many online reviews and combined the techniques of machine learning, opinion mining, and text clustering with a utility-oriented econometric model to find system aspects related to software marketing and sales for the revising requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%