1953
DOI: 10.2307/3001710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Egg Shape of Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lengths and breadths of eggs were measured using Vernier calipers (least count 0.01 mm). Shape index was calculated as per the formula described by Schultz (1953).…”
Section: Egg Quality Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lengths and breadths of eggs were measured using Vernier calipers (least count 0.01 mm). Shape index was calculated as per the formula described by Schultz (1953).…”
Section: Egg Quality Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining eggs were utilized to determine various physical qualities like egg weight, shape index (Shultz, 1953), air cell height, albumen index (Heiman and Laver, 1936), Yolk index (Funk, 1948 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings concerning the correlation between shape and egg number are less definite. Shultz (19536) did not find any correlation between these traits. Similarly, Hicks' (1958) phenotypic correlations were almost nil.…”
Section: Egg Shapementioning
confidence: 48%
“…Benjamin (1920), Marble (1943) and Shultz (19536) found no correlation between shape and size. However, Hicks (1958) who calculated genetic and environmental correlations for these traits, found an average value of 0-40 for the former and -0-27 for the latter.…”
Section: Egg Shapementioning
confidence: 85%