1966
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9163(66)90319-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of elastic and inelastic nuclear scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The We have analyzed the elastic scattering of pions (π ± ) from various nuclei 6 Li, 12 C, 40,44 Ca, 90 Zr and 118 Sn over the energy range of 163-500 MeV on the basis of strong absorption model (SAM) due to Frahn and Venter [1][2].The analyses of experimental data are carried out by a systematic variation of the SAM parameters based on the criterion of minimum root square difference between the experimental and theoretical crosssection. The obtained results of the SAM analysis rendering the best fit parameter values are presented in tables (1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The We have analyzed the elastic scattering of pions (π ± ) from various nuclei 6 Li, 12 C, 40,44 Ca, 90 Zr and 118 Sn over the energy range of 163-500 MeV on the basis of strong absorption model (SAM) due to Frahn and Venter [1][2].The analyses of experimental data are carried out by a systematic variation of the SAM parameters based on the criterion of minimum root square difference between the experimental and theoretical crosssection. The obtained results of the SAM analysis rendering the best fit parameter values are presented in tables (1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular distributions of elastic scattering of π + and π -at different energies 163 to 500 MeV from several nuclei between 6 Li and 118 Sn have been analyzed with the SAM formalism and the best fit parameters Λ, ∆ and µ have been obtained. The quality of SAM fit is poor at low beam energies and at larger angles, while in heavier nuclei a fairly good agreement is obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation