1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999ja900323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of electron auroras based on the Monte Carlo method: Application to active electron arc auroras observed by the sounding rocket at Syowa Station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the plasmaspheric model [ Rasmussen et al , ], together with the Volland‐Stern electric field and the Maynerd‐Chen potential model as a function of the K p index [ Jordanova and Miyoshi , ; Jordanova et al , ; Miyoshi et al , ], the electron density became N e =36 electrons/cm 3 , which indicated the value at the boundary of the plasmapause. The estimated resonant energies using the plasmaspheric model are in the range 0.81–2.2 keV, and its highest resonant energy can contribute to N 2+ first negative emissions [ Onda et al , ; Sergienko et al , ]. The bounce periods of resonant electrons along the geomagnetic field line are less than 4.4 s for N e <10 electrons/cm 3 and 5.1 s when using the plasmaspheric model, which are shorter than the observed repetition periods of 7.5–10 s. Other workers also reported repetition periods of PA unrelated to the bounce period of energetic electrons [ Yamamoto , ; Nishiyama et al , ].…”
Section: Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the plasmaspheric model [ Rasmussen et al , ], together with the Volland‐Stern electric field and the Maynerd‐Chen potential model as a function of the K p index [ Jordanova and Miyoshi , ; Jordanova et al , ; Miyoshi et al , ], the electron density became N e =36 electrons/cm 3 , which indicated the value at the boundary of the plasmapause. The estimated resonant energies using the plasmaspheric model are in the range 0.81–2.2 keV, and its highest resonant energy can contribute to N 2+ first negative emissions [ Onda et al , ; Sergienko et al , ]. The bounce periods of resonant electrons along the geomagnetic field line are less than 4.4 s for N e <10 electrons/cm 3 and 5.1 s when using the plasmaspheric model, which are shorter than the observed repetition periods of 7.5–10 s. Other workers also reported repetition periods of PA unrelated to the bounce period of energetic electrons [ Yamamoto , ; Nishiyama et al , ].…”
Section: Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the former method is suitable for estimating integrated quantities, such as excitation and heating rates, the latter method is required for comparison with observed particle fluxes or for studying anisotropy. The final type of calculation is the Monte Carlo approach, which is a stochastic method based on the tracking of numerous individual particles (e.g., Onda et al 1999;Solomon 1993).…”
Section: Modeling Of Auroral Energy Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%