Analysis of Energy Input–Output of Farms and Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Cotton Growers

Abstract

The concept of agricultural and environmental sustainability refers to minimizing the degradation of natural resources while increasing crop productions; assessment of inflow and outflow energy resources is helpful in highlighting the resilience of the system and maintaining its productivity. In this regard, the current study evaluated the amount of energy input–output of cotton productions and their environmental interventions. Data are randomly collected from 400 cotton farmers through face-to-face interview. Results suggested that the major energy is consumed by three culprits, i.e., chemical fertilizer, diesel fuel, and irrigation water (11,532.60, 11,121.54, and 4,531.97 MJ ha−1, respectively). Total greenhouse gas (GHG) emission is 1,106.12 kg CO2eq ha−1 with the main share coming from diesel fuel, machinery, and irrigation water. Stimulating data of energies, e.g., energy use efficiency (1.53), specific energy (7.69 MJ kg−1), energy productivity (0.13 kg MJ−1), and net energy gained (16,409.77 MJ ha−1). Further analysis using data envelopment analysis (DEA) showed that low technical efficiency, i.e., 69.02%, is the most probable cause of poor energy use efficiency. The impermanent trend in growth of energy efficiency has been witnessed with plausible potential of energy savings from 4,048.012 to 16,194.77 MJ ha−1 and a reduction of 148.96–595.96 kg CO2eq ha−1 in GHG emission. Cobb–Douglas production function is further applied to discover the associations of energy input to output, which inferred that chemical fertilizer, diesel fuel, machinery, and biocides have significant effect on cotton yield. The marginal physical productivity (MPP) values obliged that the additional use in energy (1 MJ) from fuel (diesel), biocides, and machinery can enhance cotton yield at the rate of 0.35, 1.52, and 0.45 kg ha−1, respectively. Energy saving best links with energy sharing data, i.e., 55.66% (direct), 44.34% (indirect), 21.05% (renewable), and 78.95% (nonrenewable), further unveiled the high usage of nonrenewable energy resources (fossil fuels) that ultimately contributes to high emissions of GHGs. We hope that these findings could help in the management of energy budget that we believe will reduce the high emissions of GHGs.

Phenology forcing model to estimate phenology shifting ability of extreme environmental events

“…At the same time, it is contributing to greenhouse gases and causing global warming ( Tariq et al, 2021 ). Due to the complexity of the interlinked factors with the carbon cycle, its overall impact on the environment is difficult to be determined precisely ( Rehman et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ; Abbas et al, 2022 ). Therefore, most of the time, we get only stochastic measures to estimate environmental factors, which is a major hurdle in achieving sustainable development goal 2 (SDG2) of the Food and Agriculture Organization—FAO ( Ahmad et al, 2014 ; Khan et al, 2015 ).…”

China Pakistan Economic Corridor Digital Transformation

“…We can borrow IMPACT 2002+methodology, which is an intergovernmental panel on climate change (Abbas et al, 2021 ) for CPEC digitalization between China and Pakistan. Or for digitalization, authorities can conduct direct interviews of investors from South Asian countries including China by the multistage sampling techniques used by others (Abbas et al, 2022 ). One study used a cluster of 80 farmers, and can be replicated on the above mentioned countries to understand the trends investotrs are interested in for digitalization.…”

Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of Construction Waste Generation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Index

“…This study used SBM to measure the environmental efficiency of construction waste generation in 30 Chinese provinces. The Cobb-Douglas production function is the form of production function used by most scholars in Chinese economics to analyze economic development [25][26][27]. In this production function, input labor and fixed capital are the key factors affecting economic growth.…”