2007
DOI: 10.1080/01431160701253295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of ENVISAT ASAR data for forest parameter retrieval and forest type classification—a case study over deciduous forests of central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been observed also for X-band in forests [24,49]. Based on this fundamental relation, the general sensitivity of coherence for forest structural parameters was confirmed in different studies, e.g., for stem volume [21,50], Lorey's height [21,51], and tree height [47,52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been observed also for X-band in forests [24,49]. Based on this fundamental relation, the general sensitivity of coherence for forest structural parameters was confirmed in different studies, e.g., for stem volume [21,50], Lorey's height [21,51], and tree height [47,52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The main outcome, here, was that a separation by forest type (deciduous/coniferous) did not improve the overall relations between volume coherence and forest structural parameters and that all significant relations were negative, independent of forest type (Table 3). This is in opposition to other findings that underlined the impact of stratification on the relation between SAR data and forest parameters and even showed opposing trends in models after separation of the total sample [34,52]. A general criticism of applying models across different forest types was issued by [29] who claimed that scatterplots of SAR variables against forest structural variables show clusters within the distribution that are related to the strata and thus, the statistical relationship might not reflect the actual relation within each cluster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, extensive work on the application of airborne LiDAR systems in forestry has been done [113115]. Methodologies based on LiDAR datasets have been developed to assess three-dimensional forest structures [21–26].…”
Section: Measurement Methods and Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful launch of RADARSAT-2 in 2007, which is equipped with a fully polarized SAR operating at C-Band (5.3 GHz) with a wavelength of approximately 5.6 cm, has provided a new opportunity for the use of radar to estimate AGB. Some studies [ 21 , 22 ] showed significant correlations between C-band backscatter and forest structural parameters such as diameter-at-breast height (DBH), volume, basal area, height, and AGB. However, estimating AGB using the relationship between biomass and SAR backscattering remains problematic due to not only high sensitivity to soil conditions, including surface roughness and soil moisture in low vegetation coverage, but also to saturation at high biomass levels [ 14 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%