2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2012.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of equipment failures as contributors to chemical process accidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are always multiple contributors in accidents, 2.2 on average. The ranking list of the four most common main contributors is the same as above for all contributors, but the frequencies differ somewhat (16,14,13 and 12 %, respectively). It was also found that some accident contributors act more often as main than as subcontributors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are always multiple contributors in accidents, 2.2 on average. The ranking list of the four most common main contributors is the same as above for all contributors, but the frequencies differ somewhat (16,14,13 and 12 %, respectively). It was also found that some accident contributors act more often as main than as subcontributors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Prem et al [1] analyzed three major accident databases in the USA and found that 57-63 % of the accidents were initiated by equipment failure. A specific analysis on the process equipment failures was recently carried out by Kidam and Hurme [13]. A specific analysis on the process equipment failures was recently carried out by Kidam and Hurme [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BP Texas City incident report by Baker (2007) stated the importance that "…a process safety culture survey be conducted among the workforce at BP's U.S. refineries". Incident analysis in the petrochemical sector was evaluated by Foord et al, (2006) and later by Kiddam et al, (2012) and 20% of all incidents were attributed to human factors deficiencies. Largest proportions of organizational and human failures were related to storage tanks, piping systems and process vessels accidents.…”
Section: Process Safety Culture Assessment Using Human Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several significant contributions from researches related to major accidents have been recorded in the chemical process industry. These include the works of Kidam and Hurme (Kidam and Hurme, 2013), Cheng et al (Cheng et al, 2013) and Fabiano and Currò (Fabiano and Currò, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%