Abstract. Ergovaline, the main ergopeptine alkaloid produced in tall fescue infected with Acremonium coenophialum, is known to cause tall fescue toxicosis. Current methods in use for quantifying ergovaline in plant material have several disadvantages, including large solvent volumes and long analysis time. We report here improvements in extraction and cleanup and the high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods. Our improvements include a 24-hour extraction time, the use of smaller solvent volumes during sample preparation, and fast analysis on the polymeric reverse-phase column. In addition to allowing the analysis of large batches to assist practitioners in the accurate diagnosis of fescue toxicosis, our method is also easily modified for other matrices, such as rumen fluid.Tall fescue grown throughout the United States is often infected with Acremonium coenophialum, an endophytic fungus with which it forms a mutualistic symbiotic relationship. 4 The benefits of endophyte-infected tall fescue include tolerance to both stress and pests as well as greater persistence from year to year. 4 The disadvantage of endophyte-infected fescue is that it is known to cause fescue toxicosis in livestock; symptoms are "summer syndrome," "fescue foot," and reproductive problems.1,8,9 These problems have been attributed to the presence of ergopeptine alkaloids in endophyte-infected plants, 4,9 with ergovaline accounting for 85-97% of the total ergopeptine alkaloid content.
5Previously reported high-pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) methods for quantifying ergovaline and other ergopeptine alkaloids from plant material have several drawbacks. The original method requires that all glassware be deactivated with a silanizing reagent. 6 Most methods utilize large solvent volumes during sample extraction, 6,12 and sample cleanup is normally done on solid phase extraction SPE columns made by scraping silica gel off of high-pressure thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) plates from a particular manufacturer. 6,7,12 This silica gel contains an organic binder necessary for adequate sample cleanup. In addition to having long analysis times, HPLC analysis is performed on a silica-based column, which tends to degrade slowly over time because of the basic mobile phase used. 6,7,12 All of these factors have made the analysis of large batches of samples expensive and time Received for publication July 9, 1993. consuming. A recently published paper included improvements in the assay, but the assay still involves large solvent volumes and SPE tubes prepared as described above. 3 The method reported herein involves several improvements in the overall assay. Glass treatment with deactivating reagent is unnecessary. A longer extraction time allows smaller volumes of solvent to be used without a loss of recovery. Sample cleanup is done on a bulk silica gel containing the required organic binder, which saves time previously spent scraping plates and grinding silica gel. HPLC analysis is performed on a polymeric reverse-phase column, which is st...