2013
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2013.986.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Expression of NBS-LRR Resistance Gene Analogs in Musa Acuminate During Compatible and Incompatible Interactions With Mycosphaerella Musicola

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ). This result indicated that the resistant Bukammen contains some resistance genes that are constitutively expressed, while others are induced by infection which is in line with the situation described in potato (Ronnings et al 2003 ), strawberry (Casado-Díaz et al 2006 ) and banana (Emediato et al 2013 ). The expression profile of seventeen of the RGAs identified by NBS profiling showed that the response of most RGAs (15/17) was quicker and stronger in the resistance genotype Bukammen than in the susceptible one ‘FDP821’ during the early infection stage (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 ). This result indicated that the resistant Bukammen contains some resistance genes that are constitutively expressed, while others are induced by infection which is in line with the situation described in potato (Ronnings et al 2003 ), strawberry (Casado-Díaz et al 2006 ) and banana (Emediato et al 2013 ). The expression profile of seventeen of the RGAs identified by NBS profiling showed that the response of most RGAs (15/17) was quicker and stronger in the resistance genotype Bukammen than in the susceptible one ‘FDP821’ during the early infection stage (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is the same as described in Musa acuminate ssp. burmannicoides leaves inoculated with the fungal conidiospores of Mycosphaerella musicola (Emediato et al 2013 ). They found that both in susceptible and resistant genotypes, some RGA genes were constitutively expressed across the infection time course, while some RGAs had low levels of expression at early infection stages and were upregulated in late stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But COHFBRGA-9 did not get expressed in 7 and 15 DAI and expressed only at 30 DAI with 5.851 fold change (Table 2 and Figure 1). Emediato et al, (2013) revealed that, gene expression for RGAs in both compatible and incompatible interactions across the infection time course with Mycosphaerella musicola in banana showed low levels of RGA expression in the early infection stages and up-regulation in late stages. In contrast, other RGAs displayed high expression levels in the resistant cultivar during the early infection stage, strong down-regulation in the intermediate infection stage, and recovery to higher levels in the final stages of the infection time course.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Highest fold expression was found at 15 DAI in resistance genotype by COHFBRGA26 and lowest noticed in susceptible genotype at 30 DAI by COHFBRGA38 (Figure 1). Emediato et al, (2013) revealed that, gene expression for RGAs in both compatible and incompatible interactions across the infection time course with Mycosphaerella musicola in banana showed low levels of RGA expression in the early infection stages and up-regulation in late stages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%