2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250928
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of facial expressions in response to basic taste stimuli using artificial intelligence to predict perceived hedonic ratings

Abstract: Taste stimuli can induce a variety of physiological reactions depending on the quality and/or hedonics (overall pleasure) of tastants, for which objective methods have long been desired. In this study, we used artificial intelligence (AI) technology to analyze facial expressions with the aim of assessing its utility as an objective method for the evaluation of food and beverage hedonics compared with conventional subjective (perceived) evaluation methods. The face of each participant (10 females; age range, 21… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8.1; Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands). The most significant difference between this study and the previous one [ 30 ] is the use of FaceReader, whereas a different AI application was employed in the previous report. FaceReader processes facial expressions frame-by-frame at 30 Hz and classifies them into seven emotions (neutral, happy, sad, angry, surprised, scared, and disgusted) with scores ranging from 0 (no visible emotion) to 1 (emotion fully present).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…8.1; Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands). The most significant difference between this study and the previous one [ 30 ] is the use of FaceReader, whereas a different AI application was employed in the previous report. FaceReader processes facial expressions frame-by-frame at 30 Hz and classifies them into seven emotions (neutral, happy, sad, angry, surprised, scared, and disgusted) with scores ranging from 0 (no visible emotion) to 1 (emotion fully present).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The experimental procedure and taste solutions were essentially the same as those of our previous study [ 30 ]. A group of 29 healthy female volunteers (age range, 18–55 years; mean ± SD, 23.1 ± 7.9) participated in an experiment aimed at assessing the effectiveness of AI in analyzing facial expressions and establishing a formula for predicting hedonic ratings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To conclude, it is worth noting the relevance (especially for the design of emotionally intelligent/responsive FS robots) of the past literature on Machine Learning [257] and Deep Learning [258] [259] strategies of facial expressions recognition. In addition, recent studies (under food emotion research) are of particular interest for FS robotics, for they have analyzed facial expressions (recognized with CV software applications like FaceReader™) and related these with food and beverage taste ratings [260] [261], identified ethnic differences in various facial expressions resulting from a same food tasting [262], and showed that facial expressions reflect the level of food-specific satiety [263]. These studies not only reveal the viability and usefulness of monitoring human facial expressions for robots that must interact with human FS workers/clients (e.g., to receive feedback on food prepared by the robot), but also give specific insights on how robots can interpretate facial expressions resulting from food stimuli.…”
Section: G Artificial Intelligence For Foodservice Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%