2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Facial Reanimation Procedures Performed Concurrently With Total Parotidectomy and Facial Nerve Sacrifice

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Facial reanimation procedures share the same surgical field as a parotidectomy and are most easily accomplished at the time of facial nerve sacrifice. Early reanimation would also reduce the duration of paralysis and may lead to better functional outcomes.OBJECTIVE To assess the incidence and types of facial nerve reanimation performed concurrently with total parotidectomy and facial nerve sacrifice using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cases with facial nerve sacrifice, it is surprising that only 25.5% of patients have documented reinnervation procedures, and only 24% have documented reanimation procedures (Table 2). This low rate of facial reinnervation and reanimation following radical parotidectomy is also underscored in a recent review of NSQIP [30]. This leads to the question of whether these procedures fail to be coded and thus detected by the database or whether these procedures are truly not performed commonly in cases with facial nerve sacrifice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cases with facial nerve sacrifice, it is surprising that only 25.5% of patients have documented reinnervation procedures, and only 24% have documented reanimation procedures (Table 2). This low rate of facial reinnervation and reanimation following radical parotidectomy is also underscored in a recent review of NSQIP [30]. This leads to the question of whether these procedures fail to be coded and thus detected by the database or whether these procedures are truly not performed commonly in cases with facial nerve sacrifice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimated 11.3% of patients undergoing nerve‐preservation surgery for recurrent parotid pleomorphic adenoma are left with facial palsy graded higher than House Brackmann III at 1‐year follow‐up 8 . For parotid malignancies, the rate of facial nerve sacrifice approaches 30%, with only 25% of these patients undergoing nerve repair at the time of oncologic resection 9,10 . The morbidity of facial nerve injury is significant, and patients with facial palsy report poor quality of life 11‐13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ACC NSQIP database was used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent surgery for facial paralysis between 2008 and 2019 in the United States. This was achieved by filtering for encounters with Current Procedural Terminology codes corresponding to facial‐nerve‐specific diagnoses and procedures 8 . Relevant CPT codes are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per a prior NSQIP analysis performed by Lu et al, patients who underwent surgical correction of iatrogenic facial paralysis were divided into three categories: nerve‐type repairs, sling‐type repairs, and free tissue transfer 8 . Nerve‐type repairs included CPT codes 64716, 64864, 64868, 64885, 64886, 64910, and 64727.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%