2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-022-10528-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of failure pattern in cut slopes of bedded sandstone: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the description and interpretation of the result from an individual joint set are not included in the context of this study. The susceptibility to failure is represented in the range of 0 to 100, categorized into five classes: very low (0-20), low (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), moderate (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60), high (61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the description and interpretation of the result from an individual joint set are not included in the context of this study. The susceptibility to failure is represented in the range of 0 to 100, categorized into five classes: very low (0-20), low (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), moderate (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60), high (61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematic analysis is commonly performed by the 'Markland's test' to determine the possibility of planar, wedge, and topple failure modes in rock slopes [10]. It is traditionally performed by interpreting projections of joints and slope orientations on a stereonet [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The feasibility of a particular type of failure (i.e., planar, wedge, or topple) at a particular morphological setup is determined by the orientation of discontinuity planes, their interaction with each other, and the slope face of the topography.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of structural anisotropy on the time-independent mechanical parameters of anisotropic rocks, including the compression strength and elastic modulus, have been extensively studied. A series of uniaxial and triaxial compression tests were conducted on shale, slate, schist, and phyllite to investigate the strength anisotropy of rocks (Niandou et al, 1997;Nasseri et al, 2003;Saroglou and Tsiambaos, 2008;Saeidi et al, 2013;Ali et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2015;Singh et al, 2022). All the results showed that structural anisotropy caused the rock strength to vary with the dip angle of the bedding plane α.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly believed that rock mass is heterogeneous and discontinuous, containing fissures, joints, faults, cleavage planes, and bedding planes and these structural planes dominate the mechanical behaviors of rock mass [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Different loading directions concerning structural planes orientations always make rock mass anisotropic and more problematic during engineering construction [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%