2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(04)00916-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of ferrite grain growth mechanisms during γ−α transformation in a niobium alloyed steel using EBSD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grain boundary character is also representative of the different steel microstructures, as shown in Fig 2 . All have a significant fraction of low angle boundaries (LAGB). In the ferrite-pearlite microstructure, such boundaries are created due to a selection of variants that occurs during transformation [19]. In the bainitic microstructure, LAGB-s correspond to the ferritic units within the bainitic packet and also to the boundary between certain packets [20], while the misorientation distribution for high angles depends on transformation product [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain boundary character is also representative of the different steel microstructures, as shown in Fig 2 . All have a significant fraction of low angle boundaries (LAGB). In the ferrite-pearlite microstructure, such boundaries are created due to a selection of variants that occurs during transformation [19]. In the bainitic microstructure, LAGB-s correspond to the ferritic units within the bainitic packet and also to the boundary between certain packets [20], while the misorientation distribution for high angles depends on transformation product [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly observed that prior austenite grain boundaries are the most active sites for the nucleation of ferrite, formed from recrystallized austenite, Fig. 1-a [6,7]. By deforming the austenite below the non recrystallization temperature, the strain accumulates in this phase and the grains appear In addition to grain boundary nucleation, other sites can activate, like lattice defects (deformation and twin bands, dislocation arrays…) and second phase particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different deformation sequences were applied in order to obtain a recrystallized or a deformed austenite microstructure prior to the transformation to ferrite. The tests and the applied conditions are described in [6] and [7] for Steel 1 and 2, respectively. Quenched samples were analyzed by optical and orientation imaging microscopy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, SIF exhibited less deviation from the K-S OR compared to polygonal ferrite due to its preferential nucleation along prior austenite grain boundaries (Fig. 7(f)) while following the K-S OR with at least one neighbouring parent austenite [36].…”
Section: Strain-induced Ferrite Formationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…10(b, c)), higher intensity and less spread were observed for the latter. This is probably due to the preferential nucleation of SIF grains along the prior austenite grain boundaries following the K-S OR with at least one neighbouring parent austenite [36], as well as the limited growth of SIF [41,42].…”
Section: Texture Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%