2013
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2013.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of finite dose dermal absorption data: Implications for dermal exposure assessment

Abstract: A common dermal exposure assessment strategy estimates the systemic uptake of chemical in contact with skin using the fixed fractional absorption approach: the dermal absorbed dose is estimated as the product of exposure and the fraction of applied chemical that is absorbed, assumed constant for a given chemical. Despite the prominence of this approach there is little guidance regarding the evaluation of experiments from which fractional absorption data are measured. An analysis of these experiments is present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, and generally speaking, the percent absorption is inversely related to mass coverage over a certain dose range. Therefore, the percent absorption that is presented for most compounds is a relative term that should be interpreted cautiously considering decreases in the efficiency of percutaneous absorption are expected as the applied dose is increased [25, 26]. A majority of the ZnPT doses used in the in vivo animal studies and in vitro human skin penetration studies far exceed clinically relevant deposition amounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, and generally speaking, the percent absorption is inversely related to mass coverage over a certain dose range. Therefore, the percent absorption that is presented for most compounds is a relative term that should be interpreted cautiously considering decreases in the efficiency of percutaneous absorption are expected as the applied dose is increased [25, 26]. A majority of the ZnPT doses used in the in vivo animal studies and in vitro human skin penetration studies far exceed clinically relevant deposition amounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kissel et al (2008) and Spalt et al (2009) point out that PADA was dependant on the amount of soil applied per unit area and that if multiple layers of soil are applied to the skin surface then the PADA decreases since the soil layers not touching the skin will supply less of the contaminant to the skin surface. This has been demonstrated or discussed in a number of studies (Kissel et al, 2008;Spalt et al, 2009;Frasch et al, 2014) as well as specifically for BaP in soils (Roy and Singh, 2001). Spalt et al (2009) provide an equation for loading a monolayer of soil (Equation 7).…”
Section: Soil Dosingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Dermal bioavailability review papers (n=18) appear in the literature from 2004 and cover the various aspects of dermal exposure assessment methods (Moody and Maibach, 2006;Van De Sandt et al, 2007;Frasch et al, 2014), compound group reviews (pesticides and organic flame retardants) (Tripp et al, 2007;Abdallah et al, 2015), metabolic pathways (Pannatier et al, 1978), contaminants in soil (Spalt et al,, 2009;Andersen et al, 2014), and in silico modelling (Moss et al,, 2002a;Cronin and Schultz, 2003;Degim, 2006;Anissimov et al,, 2013;Anissimov, 2014;Couto et al,, 2014 Whilst this review is primarily aimed at in vitro testing methodologies for dermal bioavailability it is important to give an overview of the in vivo approaches as these supply data from physiologically and metabolically intact systems and are considered the "gold standard", from which base in vitro tests can be developed and compared. In vivo studies are, however, associated with strong ethical issues and there is an increasing movement towards the reduction of the use of animal testing e.g.…”
Section: Dermal Bioavailability Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has been explained in depth by Frasch et al [31]. For risk assessment purposes the amount absorbed is often expressed as a percentage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%