2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of genetic diversity of ancient Ginkgo populations using SSR markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
24
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolutionary potential of a species and its ability to withstand adverse environments depend on both genetic diversity of the species and its population genetic structure (Stebbins, 1950). Different levels of genetic variation and genetic structure of populations can be attributed to multiple factors, such as distribution ranges, life forms, breeding systems, seed dispersal mechanisms, evolutionary history, natural selection, and human interference (Hamrick and Godt, 1996;Sarin et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2020). In general, the genetic diversity of widespread plant species is higher than that of narrowly distributed species (Hamrick and Godt, 1996), and compared to annual and perennial herbaceous plants, perennial woody plants tend to have higher genetic diversity at the species level and within Alt, altitude as environmental distance measured as Euclidean distance; Geo, geographic distance; Pre, precipitation as environmental distance measured as Euclidean distance using seven precipitation-related bioclimatic variables shown in Figure 3; Na, average number of alleles; He, expected heterozygosity; I, Shannon's information index.…”
Section: High Genetic Diversity Within Populations and Low Genetic DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evolutionary potential of a species and its ability to withstand adverse environments depend on both genetic diversity of the species and its population genetic structure (Stebbins, 1950). Different levels of genetic variation and genetic structure of populations can be attributed to multiple factors, such as distribution ranges, life forms, breeding systems, seed dispersal mechanisms, evolutionary history, natural selection, and human interference (Hamrick and Godt, 1996;Sarin et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2020). In general, the genetic diversity of widespread plant species is higher than that of narrowly distributed species (Hamrick and Godt, 1996), and compared to annual and perennial herbaceous plants, perennial woody plants tend to have higher genetic diversity at the species level and within Alt, altitude as environmental distance measured as Euclidean distance; Geo, geographic distance; Pre, precipitation as environmental distance measured as Euclidean distance using seven precipitation-related bioclimatic variables shown in Figure 3; Na, average number of alleles; He, expected heterozygosity; I, Shannon's information index.…”
Section: High Genetic Diversity Within Populations and Low Genetic DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the protection and maintenance of genetic diversity has important theoretical and practical implications for the protection and utilization of plant resources and genetic improvement of forest tree species. The genetic diversity and structure of populations or species can be attributed to multiple factors, such as distribution ranges, life forms, breeding systems, seed dispersal mechanisms, evolutionary history, climate factors, and human interference (overexploitation, overgrazing, landslides, and fragmentation) (Hamrick and Godt, 1996;Sarin et al, 2015;Gaisberger et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020). Identifying climatic factors affecting genetic diversity may provide insights into genetic conservation of species in the context of rapid global climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects could also be confirmed for the population genetic structure, which was investigated by STRUCTURE. Arthofer et al demonstrate that the population structure was still retained, though about a quarter of a individuals cannot be correctly assigned, when using only two loci with the Arwere 12.94 and 13.54, , respectively 5 , which were much larger than the average Ar of microsatellite sites in the other study 25 27 . Thus, it is difficult to de novo develop microsatellite primers with such high polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…var. jujuba) (Jin et al 2016;Duan et al 2017;Xu et al 2016;Zhou et al 2020) including R. pseudoacacia L. (Fabaceae; black locust) (Guo et al 2017(Guo et al , 2018Dong et al 2019a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%