2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206274
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of healthcare service utilization after transport-related injuries by a mixture of hidden Markov models

Abstract: BackgroundTransport injuries commonly result in significant disease burden, leading to physical disability, mental health deterioration and reduced quality of life. Analyzing the patterns of healthcare service utilization after transport injuries can provide an insight into the health of the affected parties, allow improved health system resource planning, and provide a baseline against which any future system-level interventions can be evaluated. Therefore, this research aims to use time series of service uti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once an appropriate algorithm has been selected, a predictive model is developed through appropriate training, calibration, validation, and peer review. The performance of supervised ML models is typically evaluated by statistical outputs, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), among others [36,49,76]. These statistics allow the comparison of the performance of different forms of supervised learning models and allow the researcher to determine the applicability of the model to clinical practice [36,98].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once an appropriate algorithm has been selected, a predictive model is developed through appropriate training, calibration, validation, and peer review. The performance of supervised ML models is typically evaluated by statistical outputs, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), among others [36,49,76]. These statistics allow the comparison of the performance of different forms of supervised learning models and allow the researcher to determine the applicability of the model to clinical practice [36,98].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of algorithms that incorporate gradient boosting has produced highly robust regression and classification methods 36 . XGBMs appear to have performed well in various domains 35,[37][38][39][40][41] and have been shown to perform particularly well on datasets characterized by class imbalance 42,43 . Many supervised learning algorithms perform well as predictive tools partly because they can estimate complex nonlinear relationships in high volume datasets using weighted statistical functions in a way that cannot be perceived by linear models or clinicians [44][45][46][47] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were analysed using Stata statistical software version 15 [20]. Descriptive data analyses are presented as means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%