2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of heterogeneity and permeability anisotropy in carbonate rock samples using digital rock physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The micro-CT data in this study encountered this problem. Histogram equalization (Gonzalez & Woods, 2002;Russ, 2006) has been the preferred choice to enhance image contrast (Sun et al, 2017). However, it has many disadvantages.…”
Section: Appendix B: Modified Automatic Contrast Adjustment Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micro-CT data in this study encountered this problem. Histogram equalization (Gonzalez & Woods, 2002;Russ, 2006) has been the preferred choice to enhance image contrast (Sun et al, 2017). However, it has many disadvantages.…”
Section: Appendix B: Modified Automatic Contrast Adjustment Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the fractured rock permeability, calculated by Palabos code, is in dimensionless lattice (or image voxel) units and marked as K l hereafter. This value is easily converted to physical units K r by Equation (9) [45]:…”
Section: Fracture Permeability Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the computation of permeability using the LBM has been evaluated as a reliable approximation to the real permeability, which have been validated by comparing simulated results with experimental data in reference [45]. In our work we also denote the permeability calculated by the LBM as K LB , i.e., K f = K LB .…”
Section: Fracture Permeability Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, 3D μ-CT images do not allow the visualization of pores smaller than the resolution limit, whereas experimental measurements are capable of measuring nanometer-scale pores. These differences in general are minor in homogeneous systems such as siliciclastic rocks (Appoloni et al, 2007), but are significant in heterogeneous rocks such as carbonates (Sun et al, 2017) and volcanic rocks. Total porosities obtained from Scale 1 images in μ-CT are lower than experimental values (Table 2).…”
Section: Fig 7 3d Representations Of Porosity Variation In Verticalmentioning
confidence: 99%