2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of heterogeneity of peritumoral T2 hyperintensity in patients with pretreatment glioblastoma: Prognostic value of MRI-based radiomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the hypothesis that the T2-weighted signal corresponds with intratumor heterogeneity and infiltrative tumor growth [39] and this area is accountable for the majority of local recurrences [40]. Therefore, radiomics features from this area are expected to be of importance for survival prediction as was also shown in previous studies [41,42]. The radiomics signature for OS consists of five features, from which two features are the first order Mean (T2-weighted) and Median (T1-weighted) describing the mean and median intensity values after the LLH and HHH wavelet decomposition of the original MR images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with the hypothesis that the T2-weighted signal corresponds with intratumor heterogeneity and infiltrative tumor growth [39] and this area is accountable for the majority of local recurrences [40]. Therefore, radiomics features from this area are expected to be of importance for survival prediction as was also shown in previous studies [41,42]. The radiomics signature for OS consists of five features, from which two features are the first order Mean (T2-weighted) and Median (T1-weighted) describing the mean and median intensity values after the LLH and HHH wavelet decomposition of the original MR images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The combined model was also able to accurately split the two cohorts in a high-and low-risk group (p-value < 0.001) ( Figure 1B,C). Previous studies also observed that combining clinical features with imaging features improves the prognostic value of the model [42,[44][45][46][47]. The model developed in this study performed similar or better compared to previous findings, even after external validation in a heterogeneous patient cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…31 More recently, the radiomic features of the peritumoral T2 hyperintensity using texture analysis in patients with pretreatment GBM suggested incremental prognostic value of peritumoral radiomics as a MRI biomarker in pretreatment glioblastoma. 32 Although the lower ADC values in the tumour region of PCNSL compared to GBM have previously been reported, 8,9,33 there are only a few studies comparing the ADC values in the peritumoral region of PCNSL and GBM. Lu et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our study showed that a combination of age and histogram based first-order textures extracted from the whole tumor could predict survival with good diagnostic performance (accuracy of 70%). Choi et al 19 also showed that a combination of clinical and texture features had higher predictive performance compared to radiomics alone. Similarly, Ingrisch et al 24 found a significant association of whole tumor MRTA with survival in GBM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all these studies utilized a selected combination of features based on shape, volume, first-, second-, and higherorder texture features, or deep features that were extracted from multiparametric or advanced imaging sequences (Appendix 1). 12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Advanced sequences are not performed routinely at all centers, require additional expertise and expense, and are time-consuming. Additionally, the extraction of higher-order features requires multiple post-processing steps and is timeconsuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%