2003
DOI: 10.1089/104454903770946683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Indian Population Based on Y-STRs Reveals Existence of Male Gene Flow across Different Language Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dravidian speakers, mostly located in South India except a small isolate in the Balochistan province of Pakistan, are a striking example of such a great divergence among populations from this subcontinent, as even close geographic neighbors have clearly distinct genetic profiles. Studies based on the Y chromosome are mostly in agreement with our results, as Indian ethnic groups, castes, and tribes are described as highly differentiated genetically, and genetic drift is likely a major factor in their variation pattern (43–47). However, some of these studies (i.e., by Saha and coworkers, 43, 44) suggest a relatively high degree of genetic admixture and no population isolation in India, while others predict restricted male gene flow in this subcontinent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dravidian speakers, mostly located in South India except a small isolate in the Balochistan province of Pakistan, are a striking example of such a great divergence among populations from this subcontinent, as even close geographic neighbors have clearly distinct genetic profiles. Studies based on the Y chromosome are mostly in agreement with our results, as Indian ethnic groups, castes, and tribes are described as highly differentiated genetically, and genetic drift is likely a major factor in their variation pattern (43–47). However, some of these studies (i.e., by Saha and coworkers, 43, 44) suggest a relatively high degree of genetic admixture and no population isolation in India, while others predict restricted male gene flow in this subcontinent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Studies based on the Y chromosome are mostly in agreement with our results, as Indian ethnic groups, castes, and tribes are described as highly differentiated genetically, and genetic drift is likely a major factor in their variation pattern (43–47). However, some of these studies (i.e., by Saha and coworkers, 43, 44) suggest a relatively high degree of genetic admixture and no population isolation in India, while others predict restricted male gene flow in this subcontinent. For example, an extensive study based on several Pakistanis ethnic groups concludes that the present Y haplotype distribution in this country is the result of both limited gene flow between populations and genetic drift in the smaller ones (48).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is supported by prehistoric, historic, and linguistic evidences where Middle East/West Asian and Central Asian gene pools have been known to have contributed to the Indian gene pool (Majumder 2001). The calculated diversity for both biallelic markers and Y-STRs strengthened the inference of a strong admixture in Indian populations reported earlier (Saha et al 2003;Saha and Bamezai 2000) and supported by median joining network (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…India presents with a pool of genetically and culturally (Cavalli-Sforza et al 1994;Majumder 2001;Saha et al 2003) diverse populations. Where on one hand, minuscule exercises of looking at caste-and region-related population structures have been continuing (Thangaraj et al 1999;Bamshad et al 2001;Kumar and Reddy 2003), the studies of the kind reported earlier and here will continue to add to the pool of information on relatedness of diverse population groups in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A perusal of above given facts makes it possible to conclude, that Khatri population is most probably a result of conglomeration of different lineages like most other North-West Indian populations (Majumder 2001;Saha et al 2003;Saha and Bamezai 2000). The results of this study can only be reinforced by further study with larger sample size as well as more DNA markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%