1990
DOI: 10.1097/00000441-199006000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Induced Sputum in the Diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven studies were excluded because bronchoscopy with BAL was performed only in subsets of patients (usually in patients with negative induced sputum results) [6,16,46,51,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Fifteen studies (seven case-control [48,[62][63][64][65][66][67] and eight retrospective and/or nonconsecutive [51,[68][69][70][71][72][73][74]) were excluded on the basis of design and/or because they did not permit direct comparison of accuracy for every individual in the sample.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies were excluded because bronchoscopy with BAL was performed only in subsets of patients (usually in patients with negative induced sputum results) [6,16,46,51,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Fifteen studies (seven case-control [48,[62][63][64][65][66][67] and eight retrospective and/or nonconsecutive [51,[68][69][70][71][72][73][74]) were excluded on the basis of design and/or because they did not permit direct comparison of accuracy for every individual in the sample.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With mucolysed-induced sputum specimens, the sensitivity for detection of P carinii has ranged from 66% to 78% for conventional stains, 13 " 1719 and 86% to 97% for commercially available fluorescent antibody stains. Before the examination of induced sputum for P carinii, the standard method has been to mucolyze the specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic procedures used in the model are shown in Table 1 and are based on reports from the literature (chest x-ray alone, oral wash with DQ, PCR, nested PCR, and rtPCR; expectorated sputum with GMS, TBO, CW; induced sputum with DQ, GMS, TBO, IS, IFA, PCR, nPCR; BAL with DQ, GMS, TBO, CW, IFA, PCR, nPCR, rtPCR) [29], [30], [31], [36], [38], [39], [40], [44], [47], [48], [49], [50], [52], [54], [55], [57], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], or estimated by the authors (oral wash with IFA, GMS, CW, TBO; expectorated sputum with DQ, IFA, PCR, nPCR, or rtPCR; induced sputum with rtPCR). Although all of the above-referenced literature was consulted, for diagnostic procedures involving any form of PCR, only studies which targeted the mitochondrial large subunit ribosomal RNA were used for estimations of sensitivity and specificity [28], [29], [36], [48], [51], [54], [55], [57], [63], [64], [67], …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%