2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of influencing factors of the production performance of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) with numerical simulation and artificial neural network (ANN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MSE values of the training and test sets were 0.447 and 0.587, respectively, and the R 2 values were 0.992 and 0.9885, respectively. These findings are consistent with the BP ANN study of the influencing factors of enhanced geothermal system production performance [43] and another study of surface roughness and energy consumption of machined parts [44]. The relative errors of the training and test sets were within 0.5 MPa, and the relative errors were within 20% except for the individual samples, showing that this method is more accurate and effective than other linear prediction methods [12].…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The MSE values of the training and test sets were 0.447 and 0.587, respectively, and the R 2 values were 0.992 and 0.9885, respectively. These findings are consistent with the BP ANN study of the influencing factors of enhanced geothermal system production performance [43] and another study of surface roughness and energy consumption of machined parts [44]. The relative errors of the training and test sets were within 0.5 MPa, and the relative errors were within 20% except for the individual samples, showing that this method is more accurate and effective than other linear prediction methods [12].…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Figures 10, 11 jointly reveal that geothermal research started with concept establishment, geophysical exploration, and geochemical exploration in the early stages (Studt and Thompson, 1969;Ólafur and Saemundsson, 1993;Tanaka, 2004) and then focused on the utilization and improvement of the thermal performance of hydrothermal geothermal resources (Qin et al, 2005;Han et al, 2010;Aneke et al, 2011;Saar, 2011). In recent years, mathematical statistics and big data analytics have been combined to generate numerical simulations and system optimizations of geothermal resources to attain the use and development of hot dry rock resources (Zeng et al, 2017;Song et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2021;Aliyu and Archer, 2021;Zinsalo et al, 2021) and promote the establishment of geothermal power stations.…”
Section: Theme Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the numerical simulation results of Wu et al were in agreement with the relevant literature, the roughness of the simulated cracks was more regular and may differ from the actual roughness. Zhou et al [69] analyzed the influence of various factors on the performance of thermal reservoirs of granite through numerical simulation and artificial neural network (ANN). 32 representative time points were selected to build 32 neural network models, which was to predict the 30-year production temperature of 32 time nodes in the system (The network architecture of the artificial neural network model is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Research Progress Of the Effect Of Fracture Structure Of Hot...mentioning
confidence: 99%