1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-5986(97)88066-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of installation effects by means of computational fluid dynamics—CFD vs experiments?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the numerical simulations used the k-ε turbulence model. Hilgenstock and Ernst [5] explored installation effects, and found good agreement with the experimentally obtained data. Holm et al [6] found that the simulated discharge coefficient was in agreement with experimental results.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the numerical simulations used the k-ε turbulence model. Hilgenstock and Ernst [5] explored installation effects, and found good agreement with the experimentally obtained data. Holm et al [6] found that the simulated discharge coefficient was in agreement with experimental results.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Fortunately, the database also contains P and all other information, which permits the regeneration of the flow rate by Eq. (5). The volumetric flow rate thus obtained is then fitted against the pressure drop across the orifice to obtain the best possible values for the power law coefficient, b.…”
Section: Gri/nist Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, numerical simulation has been proved to have good agreement with experiments for UFMs [37,38] and widely adopted in many similar researches [12,13,23,24]. This paper will adopt numerical simulation to verify the proposed method aimed at focusing on minimizing the errors caused by integration methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In natural gas industry, ultrasonic flowmeter is considered to be an important metering method for its accuracy, high repeatability, wide measurement range, simple operation, easy installation and other advantages [2][3][4][5]. However, the accuracy of the ultrasonic flowmeter is affected by different inlet velocity distributions caused by pipe configurations upstream such as bends, headers, pressure regulators or diameter changes, resulting in erroneous measurements by up to several percent [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%