2019
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2019.2924534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Inter-Pausal Units in Indian Languages and Its Application to Text-to-Speech Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peng et al [19] have presented a deep semantic approach over multiple perspectives in order to extract the correlation between two sentences. Prakash and Murthy [20] have presented a language specific approach for improving the performance of text-to-speech application. Quan et al [21] have used a tree-based integrated structure in order to find similarity between two given sentences.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al [19] have presented a deep semantic approach over multiple perspectives in order to extract the correlation between two sentences. Prakash and Murthy [20] have presented a language specific approach for improving the performance of text-to-speech application. Quan et al [21] have used a tree-based integrated structure in order to find similarity between two given sentences.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indian languages, in its written form, inherently lack punctuation marks other than sentence endings, and use manually and artificially inserted punctuation marks in modern writing (Bellur et al, 2011; Vadapalli et al, 2013). This is due to the fact that Indian languages are phrase‐based in terms of production and perception (Féry, 2010; J.J. Prakash & Murthy, 2019). Hence, much of the punctuation prediction research for these languages are mapped to phrase‐break prediction task (i.e., predicting the presence or absence of a break) predominantly for improving the naturalness of synthetic speech in speech synthesis systems (Vadapalli et al, 2013; Sarkar & Rao, 2015; A. Prakash et al, 2016; J.J. Prakash & Murthy, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that Indian languages are phrase‐based in terms of production and perception (Féry, 2010; J.J. Prakash & Murthy, 2019). Hence, much of the punctuation prediction research for these languages are mapped to phrase‐break prediction task (i.e., predicting the presence or absence of a break) predominantly for improving the naturalness of synthetic speech in speech synthesis systems (Vadapalli et al, 2013; Sarkar & Rao, 2015; A. Prakash et al, 2016; J.J. Prakash & Murthy, 2019). Since Indian languages are syllable‐timed (A. Prakash et al, 2016), much of the previous research involving phrase‐break prediction (predominantly for speech synthesis systems) revolve around syllabic features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations