1996
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00483-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms

Abstract: The current heterogeneity in data acquisition and assessment criteria among different centers results in low interinstitutional agreement in interpretation of stress echocardiograms. Agreement is higher in patients with no or advanced coronary artery disease and substantially lower in those with limited echocardiographic image quality. To increase interinstitutional agreement, better standardization of image acquisition and reading criteria of stress echocardiography is recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
229
2
16

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 537 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
229
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Those results were confirmed by [6]. The concept of using tissue Doppler for quantitative analysis of myocardial motion is superior to the very poor reproducibility achieved by just using eye-balling of grey scale information [7]. The goal of the present study is to perform intra-and inter-individual reproducibility calculations for all cardiac phases, not only systole but also diastolic measurements, and to evaluate the reproducibility of velocity based derived information like displacement, deformation (strain) and deformation velocity (strain-rate).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Those results were confirmed by [6]. The concept of using tissue Doppler for quantitative analysis of myocardial motion is superior to the very poor reproducibility achieved by just using eye-balling of grey scale information [7]. The goal of the present study is to perform intra-and inter-individual reproducibility calculations for all cardiac phases, not only systole but also diastolic measurements, and to evaluate the reproducibility of velocity based derived information like displacement, deformation (strain) and deformation velocity (strain-rate).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This system allowed substantial sparing of human and technologic resources, but it was also the logical prerequisite for a large‐scale study, designed to represent the realistic performance of the test rather than the results of a single laboratory—or even a single person—working in a highly dedicated echo laboratory. Because the assessment of the echocardiograms was qualitative and subjective, variability in reading the echocardiograms might have modulated the results of individual centers,54 especially for some parameters (eg, LV mass, which can be assessed with accuracy only with quantitative, relatively elaborated assessment). However, all of our readers in individual centers had a long‐lasting experience in echocardiography, passed the quality control in stress echo reading as previously described,55 and had extensive experience on execution and interpretation of CFR through joint reading sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are different stress modalities (in particular, low-dose dobutamine stress) for the detection of viable myocardium (46). Despite the high reported accuracy of exercise echocardiography in the diagnosis of CHD, the sensitivity and specificity can be affected by multiple factors (58,59). In most cases, decreased accuracy is caused by suboptimal image quality and decreased detection of the endocardial border.…”
Section: Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one constant problem is reproducibility (58,77,88). Additional second problem is the "low volume" of SE examinations by a single operator in clinical practice (32).…”
Section: Pitfalls and Limitations Of Diagnosing Ischemia Via Echocardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation