OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey 2016
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2016.7761402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of J-Pole antenna configurations for underwater communications

Abstract: The capability of relatively high-speed short-range communications of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) in underwater scenarios, for example, for communication between vehicles or when the AUV is approaching a docking station for downloading of data gathered during a survey mission, is becoming a relevant application in the context of sea exploration and mining. In this paper the analysis of the J-pole antenna and two of its configurations namely Super J-pole and Collinear J-pole antennas are presented, ai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect at -10 dB of the reflection coefficient, DipP achieved 65 MHz bandwidth, between 10 MHz and 74 MHz, whereas DipH has a slightly higher bandwidth of 74 MHz, between 9 MHz and 83 MHz. These results shows an improvement when compared with the performance of the J-pole antenna in the same medium, as presented in [11]. Another important parameter that was simulated is the directivity which, at 25 MHz equals 10.70 dB and 12.50 dB and at 40 MHz equals 8.50 dB and 9.92 dB for DipP and DipH respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect at -10 dB of the reflection coefficient, DipP achieved 65 MHz bandwidth, between 10 MHz and 74 MHz, whereas DipH has a slightly higher bandwidth of 74 MHz, between 9 MHz and 83 MHz. These results shows an improvement when compared with the performance of the J-pole antenna in the same medium, as presented in [11]. Another important parameter that was simulated is the directivity which, at 25 MHz equals 10.70 dB and 12.50 dB and at 40 MHz equals 8.50 dB and 9.92 dB for DipP and DipH respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In one of the previous works for underwater antenna design in this group [11], the capability of J-pole antenna configurations to achieve bandwidths above 30 MHz was assessed and presented. However, when there is the need for higher throughput, for example, as in real-time video transmission, which may occur between underwater sensor nodes and an AUV or between AUVs and a docking station, these antennas 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9…”
Section: Overview Of the Antennas And Designingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous research and development efforts are essential to enhance antenna performance for underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs). Promising future directions include material exploration, where developing novel materials with low conductivity and high permittivity for antenna construction can minimize signal attenuation in seawater [51]. Additionally, metamaterialinspired designs offer exciting possibilities for manipulating electromagnetic waves, potentially leading to antennas with improved radiation characteristics and reduced size 5 [2].…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antena J-Pole merupakan antena monopol omnidireksional yang proses matching antenanya menggunakan stub seperempat gelombang secara paralel [8]. Antena J-Pole memiliki kinerja mirip dengan antena dipole, karena pada fase elemen 1/4λ gelombang antena J-Pole akan saling menghilangkan terhadap elemen lawannya yaitu elemen 3/4 [9][ [10].…”
Section: Antena Super J-poleunclassified