2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of joint formation mechanisms for self-piercing riveting (SPR) process with varying joining parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To systematically investigate the influences of surface conditions at different interfaces, a previously developed [38] and validated 2D FE model of the SPR process was adopted as…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To systematically investigate the influences of surface conditions at different interfaces, a previously developed [38] and validated 2D FE model of the SPR process was adopted as…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To systematically investigate the influences of surface conditions at different interfaces, a previously developed [38] and validated 2D FE model of the SPR process was adopted as shown in Figure 5a. Commercial software Simufact.Forming 15 was employed due to its strong re-meshing capability.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Zhao et al studied the self-piercing rivet process of AA7075 sheets using different sheet thicknesses (1–2 mm) and ratios. The highest interlock ratio and inlet length were achieved by using a 6 mm rivet length at a sheet thickness ratio of 1.2 mm/1.8 mm [15]. Kim et al estimated the mechanical properties of different steel and aluminium sheet combinations joined with self-piercing riveting using a deep learning approach [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%