2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62404-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Keystroke Dynamics for Fatigue Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, the analyses in this paper did not account for changes in the writing processes over the course of the task. However, it could be that participants’ typing and/or pausing behavior changed over time because of factors such as fatigue or stress, due to a learning effect, or because they adapted their strategies to changes in the task situation ( Rijlaarsdam and Van den Bergh, 1996 ; Vizer et al, 2009 ; Ulinskas et al, 2017 ; Xu, 2018 ). To take into account such fluctuations, future studies could treat the writing processes as time series in their analyses ( Allen et al, 2016 ; Pham, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the analyses in this paper did not account for changes in the writing processes over the course of the task. However, it could be that participants’ typing and/or pausing behavior changed over time because of factors such as fatigue or stress, due to a learning effect, or because they adapted their strategies to changes in the task situation ( Rijlaarsdam and Van den Bergh, 1996 ; Vizer et al, 2009 ; Ulinskas et al, 2017 ; Xu, 2018 ). To take into account such fluctuations, future studies could treat the writing processes as time series in their analyses ( Allen et al, 2016 ; Pham, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another paper, Ulinskas et al [15] used an existing keystroke dynamics dataset that came from recordings from 53 people typing the same password, in order to recognize user fatigue. From the data, they extracted as features the keystroke durations and all the different forms of diagram latencies.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Epp et al [8], besides various time intervals, the number of errors, the number of keystrokes, and the number of characters were also used as the original features, from which the feature subset was selected by the feature selection approach. With some statistical values (e.g., average, equation, skewness, autocorrelation, and moment) and information measurements (e.g., entropy) of the time interval as the features, Ulinskas et al [9] applied a feature selection approach to select a feature subset from them. Based on fuzzy logic, de ru and Eloff [10] divided the time interval into four categories, that is, very short, short, moderately short, and somewhat short, as the characteristics of keystrokes.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%