2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering 2011
DOI: 10.1109/csae.2011.5953160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of landing impact performance for lunar lander based on flexible body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors tried to study the soft landing problem by means of simulation software, and chose as a case study a four-legged lander. For example, Xu et al in 2011 simulated the soft-landing of a lunar lander first using MSC-ADAMS considering the lunar soil as a rigid body, and then MSC-DYTRAN considering the lunar soil as a flexible body [16]. Wan et al in 2010, chose MSC-DYTRAN to simulate soft-landing of a lunar lander with the finite elements method and a nonlinear transient dynamics approach [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors tried to study the soft landing problem by means of simulation software, and chose as a case study a four-legged lander. For example, Xu et al in 2011 simulated the soft-landing of a lunar lander first using MSC-ADAMS considering the lunar soil as a rigid body, and then MSC-DYTRAN considering the lunar soil as a flexible body [16]. Wan et al in 2010, chose MSC-DYTRAN to simulate soft-landing of a lunar lander with the finite elements method and a nonlinear transient dynamics approach [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the above research did not consider the influence of landing strut lateral flexibility on the friction force. Xu et al 12 and Dong et al 13 studied lunar lander model with nonlinear finite element method which can predict the friction force between cylinders precisely through the establishment of nonlinear contact model. Although this method can ensure good calculation accuracy, its modeling and calculation process is complex, time-consuming, and inefficient, lacking in adaptability of multiple working conditions analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%