1990
DOI: 10.1109/50.60571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of laser phase noise to intensity noise conversion by chromatic dispersion in intensity modulation and direct detection optical-fiber transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly in both cases the transmitted power has stabilised more rapidly than the Q factor, strongly indicating that penalties from attenuation of the modulation sidebands do not dominate the observed BER variations. For the linewidth dependant errors, we follow standard analysis for phase shift keyed signals [26] and phase noise to intensity noise conversion [22,23] based on temporarily invariant linewidths.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Packetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly in both cases the transmitted power has stabilised more rapidly than the Q factor, strongly indicating that penalties from attenuation of the modulation sidebands do not dominate the observed BER variations. For the linewidth dependant errors, we follow standard analysis for phase shift keyed signals [26] and phase noise to intensity noise conversion [22,23] based on temporarily invariant linewidths.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Packetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. For the Monte Carlo simulations, sequences of 2 18 were used, so only levels of BER lower than 10 −4 could be simulated with confidence. In addition, we checked the validity of our model against the numerical simulations for different ISI scenarios.…”
Section: B Ber and Source Linewidthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Appendix V, we prove that the interferometric RIN is the same as in the case of incoherent direct-detection systems. The power spectral density N Y (f ) is therefore (see [18] and Appendix V)…”
Section: Fiber Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Phase noise can also be considered following such an approach, but only with the approximation that phase variations at a given frequency contribute solely to intensity variations at that same frequency -otherwise the calculation becomes intractable. 2 Analyses valid in the limiting cases of small amplitude variations (i.e., a small-signal model 3 ) and small propagation distance and low frequency 4 have also been presented. The small-signal model assumes that the optical field can be described as E͑t͒ p I 0 ͓1 1 D͑t͒ 1 if͑t͔͒exp͑iv 0 t͒, where D͑t͒ and f͑t͒ are small, zeromean amplitude variations and phase variations, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%