2016
DOI: 10.7708/ijtte.2016.6(4).06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Lateral Distance Keeping Behaviour in Mixed Traffic Conditions With Little Lane Discipline

Abstract: Lateral distribution of vehicles across the carriageway was the most important characteristic of traffic with little lane discipline. The absence of lane behaviour implies that a driver not only interacts longitudinally with the vehicles ahead but also laterally with vehicles on its sides. The discipline of lane based driving can be examined from the lateral position of vehicles across the carriageway. An analysis of lane changing behaviour indicates characteristic differences in lane changing for distinct veh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have attributed this driving behaviour to inadequate lane markings and lane width, poor visibility, poor road surface and deterioration in perfect driving attitudes (Gunay 2003(Gunay , 2004(Gunay , 2007Khan, Maini 1999). Further, weak lane discipline is predominant in developing countries (Mathew et al 2015;Mallikarjuna, Rao 2011;Mahapatra, Maurya 2013;Bangarraju et al 2016). Vehicles in weak lane discipline environment are affected by lead vehicles located in the adjacent lanes or positions (Mathew et al 2015;Gunay 2003Gunay , 2007Bangarraju et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Researchers have attributed this driving behaviour to inadequate lane markings and lane width, poor visibility, poor road surface and deterioration in perfect driving attitudes (Gunay 2003(Gunay , 2004(Gunay , 2007Khan, Maini 1999). Further, weak lane discipline is predominant in developing countries (Mathew et al 2015;Mallikarjuna, Rao 2011;Mahapatra, Maurya 2013;Bangarraju et al 2016). Vehicles in weak lane discipline environment are affected by lead vehicles located in the adjacent lanes or positions (Mathew et al 2015;Gunay 2003Gunay , 2007Bangarraju et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, weak lane discipline is predominant in developing countries (Mathew et al 2015;Mallikarjuna, Rao 2011;Mahapatra, Maurya 2013;Bangarraju et al 2016). Vehicles in weak lane discipline environment are affected by lead vehicles located in the adjacent lanes or positions (Mathew et al 2015;Gunay 2003Gunay , 2007Bangarraju et al 2016). Researchers have opined that vehicles veer laterally to select appropriate lane position and speed based on the lead vehicle(s) (Drew 1968;Case et al 1953;May 1959).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, their study pointed out that driving trajectories are a promising surrogate measure of safety as highlighted by the correlation between the trajectories identified as dangerous and the radii of the curves. Another study analyzed driving trajectories with little lane discipline [7]. By studying lateral distance-keeping behavior, lane keeping behavior and the lateral behavior of vehicles, the article explored the nonlane-based behavior of traffic.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce human errors during data extraction to a minimum, Chakradhar Reddy et al, (2017), supported the extracted vehicular trajectory data on homogeneous traffic conditions and proposed that Moving Average is the most appropriate approach. The lateral gap was observed by Bangarraju and Ravi Shankar (2016) Time to collision for longitudinal behavior of driver was also carried out by some researchers and is varies from 0.5 sec to 90 sec depending on relative distance and velocity. In the case of opening the mid-range section, rear and side swipe collisions are more common.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%