2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of linear and nonlinear features of a flat plate breakwater with the boundary element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison is performed between the FSFS (in this case, due to the geometry, pressure methods cannot be implemented) and a very classical one, i.e. the boundary element method (Lalli 1997;Lalli et al 2012). As in previous examples, convective terms in the Navier-Stokes equation have been neglected.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison is performed between the FSFS (in this case, due to the geometry, pressure methods cannot be implemented) and a very classical one, i.e. the boundary element method (Lalli 1997;Lalli et al 2012). As in previous examples, convective terms in the Navier-Stokes equation have been neglected.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sequence composed of s i , a i , r i and s i+1 (also expressed as tuple (s i , a i , r i , s i+1 )) is used to train the ANN in the DRL model. Figure 6 further clarifies the process of interaction, from which it is known that N = 64 tuples are first sampled from Buffer and calculated the value of L k (refers to ( 16), (17), and ( 18)) to update the critic networks Q θ k (k = 2) later. Subsequently, actor network π φ and target networks Q θ k and π φ are updated every d = 2 iterations, where π φ is updated by (19) and the expressions to softly update the target networks are given as follows:…”
Section: ) Ann Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%