2018
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2018.1539410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of local-camera-based shepherding navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most shepherding control approaches assume that the shepherd(s) have global knowledge of the swarm agent positions, Tsunado et al [56] tested a more sheepdog-realistic scenario in which the shepherd only had swarm position information collected via a local camera. Three different shepherding control strategies were used.…”
Section: Shepherding Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most shepherding control approaches assume that the shepherd(s) have global knowledge of the swarm agent positions, Tsunado et al [56] tested a more sheepdog-realistic scenario in which the shepherd only had swarm position information collected via a local camera. Three different shepherding control strategies were used.…”
Section: Shepherding Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the literature (see, e.g., [14], [15]), we adopt the following equation as the mathematical model for describing the movement of the sheep agents:…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we describe the algorithm we propose for the movement of the shepherd agents. We start by recalling the Farthest-Agent Targeting (FAT) algorithm [14] designed for the case of a single shepherd (i.e., M = 1). In the algorithm, the movement of the (1st) shepherd is specified as q 1 (t + 1) = q 1 (t) + v 1 (t), where v 1 (t) ∈ R 2 represents the movement vector of the shepherd.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations