2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of managed aquifer recharge for retiming streamflow in an alluvial river

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent droughts have increased reliance on groundwater and renewed interest in MAR [e.g., Scanlon et al ., ; Ronayne et al ., ]. Previous studies acknowledge challenges in the implementation of MAR, including lacking supplemental water for MAR, impacts to senior water users due to MAR diversions, locating recharge facilities, and other regionally specific issues [ Bouwer , ; Kumar et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent droughts have increased reliance on groundwater and renewed interest in MAR [e.g., Scanlon et al ., ; Ronayne et al ., ]. Previous studies acknowledge challenges in the implementation of MAR, including lacking supplemental water for MAR, impacts to senior water users due to MAR diversions, locating recharge facilities, and other regionally specific issues [ Bouwer , ; Kumar et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although increases in natural discharge may not be the goal of a particular MAR project and may be considered a nonbeneficial use [ Neuman , ], increases in discharge by natural vegetation implies enhanced ecosystem services within the basin [ Bolund and Hunhammar , ; Eamus and Froend , ; Dillon et al ., ; Fisher , ]. Clearly, these simulations indicate that Ag‐MAR substantially enhances long‐term aquifer storage in the basin, which is an important goal of water management in semiarid regions [ Ronayne et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar groundwater storage gains were found by Niswonger et al () (e.g., 26–29% depending on aquifer hydraulic conductivity) for large‐scale Ag‐MAR simulations in the Carson Valley, NV and Ghasemizade et al () for the eastern San Joaquin Valley, CA. Other large‐scale MAR modeling studies have seen lower gains in groundwater storage (e.g., Ronayne et al, ; Scherberg et al, ); however, most studies observed similar clear benefits of recharge for groundwater‐dependent ecosystems and instream flows. Similar to findings of Kendy and Bredehoeft () and Ronayne et al () recharge effects on seasonal streamflows and particularly summer low flows were greatest when MAR programs were extended over longer recharge seasons that allowed capturing more surface water excess flows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Other large‐scale MAR modeling studies have seen lower gains in groundwater storage (e.g., Ronayne et al, ; Scherberg et al, ); however, most studies observed similar clear benefits of recharge for groundwater‐dependent ecosystems and instream flows. Similar to findings of Kendy and Bredehoeft () and Ronayne et al () recharge effects on seasonal streamflows and particularly summer low flows were greatest when MAR programs were extended over longer recharge seasons that allowed capturing more surface water excess flows. The recharge caused widespread increases in groundwater levels within the OAWD study area of as much as 90 ft (27.4 m) for some of the recharge scenarios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%