1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(95)00210-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of mass and heat transfer in transient experiments over heterogeneous catalysts

Abstract: Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling of spatio-temporal evolution may serve as a powerful complementary tool to experimental non-isothermal reaction-diffusion (RD) systems within a porous catalyst particle and membrane (Weisz and Hicks, 1962, Hlavecek et al, 1969, Aris, 1975, Froment and Bischoff, 1979, Dekker et al, 1995, Pan and Zhu, 1998, Levent et al, 1998, Levent, 2001, Kafarov et al, 1998and Burghardt and Berezowski, 2003Selegny et al, 1995a andSelegny et al, 1995b). Non-isothermal RD systems represent thermodynamically and mathematically coupled transport and chemical processes, and need a through analysis, as they may evolve multiple steady states with unique dynamic phenomena (Burghardt and Berezowski, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling of spatio-temporal evolution may serve as a powerful complementary tool to experimental non-isothermal reaction-diffusion (RD) systems within a porous catalyst particle and membrane (Weisz and Hicks, 1962, Hlavecek et al, 1969, Aris, 1975, Froment and Bischoff, 1979, Dekker et al, 1995, Pan and Zhu, 1998, Levent et al, 1998, Levent, 2001, Kafarov et al, 1998and Burghardt and Berezowski, 2003Selegny et al, 1995a andSelegny et al, 1995b). Non-isothermal RD systems represent thermodynamically and mathematically coupled transport and chemical processes, and need a through analysis, as they may evolve multiple steady states with unique dynamic phenomena (Burghardt and Berezowski, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common criterion applied to heterogeneous reactions states that if E ex is larger than 0.95, external mass transport limitation is negligible in the system. 61 The analysis of the local E ex distributions in the three reactors shown in Figure 9 reveals that E ex was very low at those areas where surface reaction was taking place (areas with significant UV irradiance). This result implies that at those regions, the surface reaction rate was much higher than the mass transport rate which induced overall a diffusion controlled process.…”
Section: Cfd Simulations Of the Prototype Annular Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, an external mass transfer of propane/air reactants over the surface of catalysts determined the mass diffusion to the CPOX process. Such an external mass transfer behaviour can be practically characterized by the Carberry number (Ca), a ratio between the observed reaction rate and the maximum external mass transfer [44]. As defined in Equation (7) [45], C b stands for the propane species bulk concentration and a 0 represents the specific external surface of used catalyst.…”
Section: Catalytic Partial Oxidation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dekker et al [44] suggested that Ca should be smaller than 0.05 as a criterion for negligible transport effects in gas phase steady-state heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Therefore, from our estimated Ca value, it was concluded that the LTCC micro-reactor was operating in a kinetics-limited region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%